Ohhmua.com Editorial Standards

Last Updated: November 23, 2025

---

Our Mission

Ohhmua.com was founded to help PC builders, gamers, and tech enthusiasts make informed hardware purchasing decisions. We’re committed to providing honest, experience-based reviews through rigorous testing, without bias from manufacturers or commercial interests.

---

1. Our Review Process (5 Steps)

Step 1: Product Selection & Acquisition

How we choose what to review:

• We prioritize hardware based on reader interest and market relevance
• We focus on components that people are actively researching
• We analyze market trends to ensure comprehensive coverage

How we obtain products:

• We purchase most hardware with our own funds
• Some products are provided as press samples (always disclosed)
• We never accept payment or incentives for coverage
• Review samples are tested with the same rigor as purchased items

Step 2: Real-World Testing (Minimum 14 Days)

Our testing methodology:

• Every component undergoes at least 2 weeks of real-world use
• We test in actual PC builds, not just lab conditions
• Multiple system configurations to ensure compatibility
• Both synthetic benchmarks and real-world applications
• Stress testing for stability and reliability

What we test:

• Performance across multiple workloads (gaming, productivity, content creation)
• Thermal performance under sustained load
• Power consumption and efficiency
• Build quality and materials
• Software/firmware experience
• Long-term stability and reliability

Step 3: Benchmarking & Data Collection

Our testing standards:

• All benchmarks run minimum 3 times for consistency
• Controlled test environment (temperature, power, settings)
• Multiple driver/BIOS versions tested when relevant
• Results verified across different system configurations
• Raw data preserved for transparency

Software we use:

• Benchmarks: 3DMark, Cinebench R23/R24, Geekbench, AIDA64
• Gaming: 15+ popular titles across different engines
• Productivity: Blender, Handbrake, Adobe Creative Suite
• Monitoring: HWiNFO64, GPU-Z, CPU-Z, Core Temp
• Stress testing: Prime95, OCCT, FurMark, Memtest86

Step 4: Writing & Editorial Review

Content creation process:

Author writes initial draft:

• Based on personal testing experience
• Includes both strengths and weaknesses
• Provides context and comparisons
• Written for actual PC builders, not marketing

Technical Editor reviews:

• Verifies all specifications and technical claims
• Checks benchmark methodology
• Ensures testing was comprehensive
• Validates conclusions match data

Fact-Checker verifies:

• All product specifications against official sources
• Pricing and availability
• Compatibility claims
• Historical context and comparisons

Copy Editor ensures:

• Clear, accessible language
• Proper grammar and formatting
• Consistent style and tone
• No unsubstantiated claims

Step 5: Publication & Ongoing Updates

After publication:

• We monitor for price changes and update accordingly
• We revisit reviews when new drivers/BIOS updates release
• We update when competing products launch
• We add notes about long-term reliability issues if discovered
• Every update is timestamped and noted clearly

Update schedule:

• Major reviews: Every 3-6 months
• Price checks: Weekly for active products
• Driver/BIOS updates: As released
• Comparison updates: When new competitors launch

---

2. Our Commitments & Standards

✅ WE COMMIT TO:

Honest & Objective Testing

• Every review reflects our genuine testing experience
• We highlight both strengths and weaknesses equally
• We never hide or downplay problems we encounter
• If a product doesn’t perform well, we say so clearly

Complete Transparency

• We disclose all affiliate relationships
• We identify press samples vs. purchased products
• We explain our testing methodology in detail
• We publish raw benchmark data upon request
• We admit when we make mistakes

Editorial Independence

• No manufacturer controls our editorial process
• We maintain full editorial independence
• Our conclusions are based solely on testing results
• We never accept payment for positive coverage
• We decline attempts to influence our reviews

Technical Accuracy

• All specifications verified against official sources
• Benchmarks conducted with documented methodology
• Claims supported by actual test results
• Technical details reviewed by subject matter experts

Reader-First Focus

• We write for people building PCs, not manufacturers
• We provide practical advice for different budgets
• We recommend alternatives when appropriate
• We answer the questions actual buyers have
• We consider real-world use cases, not just specs

❌ WE DO NOT:

Accept Biased Arrangements

• ❌ Accept payment for positive reviews
• ❌ Allow manufacturers to approve content before publication
• ❌ Accept high-value gifts or incentives
• ❌ Guarantee positive coverage in exchange for access
• ❌ Remove negative information at manufacturer request

Compromise Testing Integrity

• ❌ Use manufacturer-supplied benchmarks without verification
• ❌ Cherry-pick best results and hide poor performance
• ❌ Test in unrealistic or misleading conditions
• ❌ Skip stability testing to rush publication
• ❌ Copy test results from other sources

Mislead Readers

• ❌ Use clickbait headlines that misrepresent content
• ❌ Hide problems to increase affiliate earnings
• ❌ Recommend inferior products for higher commissions
• ❌ Copy content from other websites
• ❌ Fabricate testing we didn’t actually perform

Engage in Unfair Practices

• ❌ Attack competitors or brands unfairly
• ❌ Spread unverified rumors or speculation as fact
• ❌ Participate in coordinated review timing for launches
• ❌ Accept NDAs that prevent honest criticism
• ❌ Prioritize advertising relationships over reader trust

---

3. Affiliate Link Policy

Full Transparency on Monetization

How affiliate links work: Some of our articles contain affiliate links to retailers like Amazon, Newegg, and other vendors. If you purchase a product through these links, we earn a small commission at no additional cost to you.

Our promise regarding affiliates:

✅ We DO:

• Clearly label affiliate links
• Recommend products based solely on testing merit
• Suggest better alternatives even if commissions are lower
• Point out product flaws that might lose us sales
• Update recommendations when better options emerge

❌ We DO NOT:

• Recommend products purely for commission rates
• Hide negative aspects to increase sales
• Prioritize high-commission products in rankings
• Use affiliate earnings as a factor in our reviews
• Allow commission structures to influence our opinions

Editorial vs. Commercial: Our editorial team operates independently from any commercial considerations. Writers and testers don’t know commission rates when making recommendations. Our technical opinions and test results are never influenced by potential earnings.

Alternative shopping: You’re free to shop wherever you prefer. We provide links for convenience, but our advice remains the same regardless of where you buy.

---

4. Corrections & Complaints Policy

We Take Accuracy Seriously

When we discover errors:

Minor errors (typos, formatting):

• Corrected immediately
• No notification needed
• “Last Updated” date refreshed

Factual errors (specs, pricing, availability):

• Corrected immediately
• Correction note added to article
• “Last Updated” date refreshed
• Previous version available upon request

Significant errors (wrong conclusions, major spec mistakes):

• Article updated with prominent correction notice
• Explanation of what was wrong and why
• Apology if error materially misled readers
• Email notification to subscribers if appropriate
• Editor’s note explaining the correction

Testing errors:

• Re-test if methodology was flawed
• Update article with new results
• Full disclosure of what went wrong
• Compare old vs. new results transparently

How to Report Issues

Submit complaints or corrections:

📧 Editorial Email: [email protected]
📧 Specific Concerns: [email protected]

Our response timeline:

1. Acknowledgment: Within 24 hours
2. Investigation: 2-3 business days
3. Resolution: 5 business days maximum
4. Follow-up: Confirmation of action taken

What to include in your report:

• Article URL and date
• Specific claim you’re questioning
• Evidence or sources supporting your concern
• Your contact information (kept private)

Possible outcomes:

• Article corrected with notation
• Article revised with editor’s note
• Article retracted if fundamentally flawed
• Explanation if we believe article is accurate
• Clarification added if original was ambiguous

Appeals Process

If you’re unsatisfied with our response:

1. Reply to our response with additional concerns
2. Request review by Editor-in-Chief
3. We’ll provide a final determination within 5 business days

---

5. Our Testing Lab & Standards

Test Bench Specifications

Primary Test System:

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X / Intel Core i9-13900K
Motherboard: ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Hero / MSX Z790 Hero
RAM: 32GB DDR5-6000 CL30 (G.Skill Trident Z5)
GPU: NVIDIA RTX 4090 Founders Edition
Storage: Samsung 990 Pro 2TB NVMe
PSU: Corsair RM1000x 1000W 80+ Gold
Cooling: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360
Case: Fractal Design Torrent
Monitor: LG 27GP950-B (4K 144Hz)

Secondary Test Systems:

• Mid-range configuration (Ryzen 5/RTX 4060)
• Budget configuration (Ryzen 5/RTX 3060)
• Intel/AMD cross-compatibility testing

Testing Environment:

• Controlled room temperature (22-24°C)
• Consistent ambient conditions
• Isolated from external interference
• Documented for every test session

Benchmark Suite

Gaming Benchmarks (15+ titles):

• Cyberpunk 2077 (Ray Tracing)
• Red Dead Redemption 2
• Microsoft Flight Simulator
• Starfield
• Baldur’s Gate 3
• Counter-Strike 2
• Valorant
• Fortnite
• Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III
• Assassin’s Creed Mirage
• F1 23
• Shadow of the Tomb Raider
• Hitman 3
• Far Cry 6
• And more (updated quarterly)

Productivity Benchmarks:

• Cinebench R23/R24 (Multi/Single-core)
• Blender (Multiple scenes)
• Handbrake (4K video encoding)
• Adobe Premiere Pro (4K timeline export)
• 7-Zip compression
• PCMark 10 (Overall productivity)
• Geekbench 6

Synthetic Benchmarks:

• 3DMark (Time Spy, Port Royal, Speed Way)
• CPU-Z (Single/Multi thread)
• AIDA64 (Memory, cache, CPU)
• CrystalDiskMark (Storage)

Stress Testing:

• Prime95 (CPU stability)
• OCCT (Power supply, stability)
• FurMark (GPU stress)
• Memtest86 (RAM stability)
• Extended gaming sessions (thermal soak)

Testing Methodology Documentation

Every review includes:

• Test bench specifications
• BIOS/driver versions used
• Graphics settings for each game
• Resolution and quality presets
• Number of runs performed
• Ambient temperature
• Any notable variables

We avoid:

• Testing in unrealistic scenarios
• Using beta drivers unless noted
• Overclocking without disclosure
• Non-standard settings without explanation
• Cherry-picking only favorable results

---

6. Content Categories & Standards

Hardware Reviews

Motherboards, CPUs, GPUs, RAM, Storage, PSUs, Cases, Cooling

Minimum requirements:

• 14+ days of testing
• Multiple system configurations
• Stability testing
• Thermal and power measurements
• Price-to-performance analysis
• Competition comparison

Build Guides

How-to content, PC building tutorials, component selection

Standards:

• Step-by-step instructions with photos
• Current pricing and availability
• Alternative component recommendations
• Compatibility verification
• Common pitfalls and solutions

Buying Guides

Best [Component] for [Use Case], Round-ups, Recommendations

Requirements:

• Personal testing of recommended products
• Multiple price tiers covered
• Regular updates (monthly minimum)
• Clear winner selection criteria
• Budget alternatives included

News & Analysis

Hardware launches, industry trends, technical deep-dives

Guidelines:

• Verified sources required
• Speculation clearly labeled
• Technical accuracy paramount
• Context and analysis added
• Updated as situations develop

---

7. Team & Responsibilities

Editorial Structure

Founder & Editor-in-Chief

• Final editorial authority
• Review oversight for flagship products
• Standards enforcement
• Reader complaint resolution
• Strategic direction

Hardware Specialists

• Subject matter experts for specific components
• Hands-on testing and review writing
• Benchmark execution
• Technical accuracy

Technical Editors

• Verify all technical claims
• Check testing methodology
• Ensure benchmark validity
• Review product specifications

Fact-Checkers

• Verify pricing and availability
• Cross-reference specifications
• Check competitive comparisons
• Validate historical claims

Copy Editors

• Grammar and clarity
• Style consistency
• Reader accessibility
• No unsubstantiated claims

Meet our full team →

---

8. Privacy & Data Protection

Your privacy matters:

• We don’t collect personal information beyond necessary purposes
• We never sell user data to third parties
• We comply with GDPR and privacy regulations
• Comments and emails are kept confidential
• Contact information used only for stated purposes

View our full Privacy Policy →

---

9. Contact Information

Get in Touch

Editorial Inquiries: 📧 [email protected]
For article suggestions, topic requests, general editorial questions

Corrections & Complaints: 📧 [email protected]
For reporting errors, filing complaints, requesting corrections

Technical Support: 📧 [email protected]
For website technical issues, access problems

Response Time:

• Editorial inquiries: 48 hours
• Corrections: 24 hours
• Technical support: 24-48 hours
• Business inquiries: 3-5 business days

---

10. Continuous Improvement

We’re committed to maintaining the highest standards in tech journalism.

How we improve:

• Regular team training on new hardware and testing methods
• Quarterly review of editorial standards
• Annual third-party audit of testing methodology
• Reader feedback surveys
• Industry best practices research
• Learning from mistakes and corrections

Recent improvements:

• Expanded GPU testing suite (Sept 2025)
• Added DDR5 stability testing (Aug 2025)
• Implemented power efficiency metrics (July 2025)
• Enhanced thermal testing protocol (June 2025)

Next scheduled review: February 2026

---

11. Independence & Ethics

Editorial Independence Statement

Ohhmua.com operates independently and is not owned by, affiliated with, or controlled by any hardware manufacturer, retailer, or distributor. Our reviews are based solely on our testing and analysis.

We maintain independence by:

• Purchasing most test products ourselves
• Declining editorial control as condition of access
• Turning down paid review opportunities
• Separating editorial and business operations
• Refusing advertising that compromises objectivity

Ethical Guidelines

What we accept: ✅ Press samples for review (disclosed) ✅ Press event access ✅ Affiliate commissions (disclosed) ✅ Standard display advertising (no influence on content)

What we decline: ❌ Payment for positive coverage ❌ Manufacturer approval of content ❌ High-value gifts or incentives ❌ Exclusive deals requiring favorable coverage ❌ Advertising requiring editorial changes

Gray areas: When uncertain about accepting something, we:

1. Disclose it fully to readers
2. Consult with editorial leadership
3. Err on the side of transparency and caution

---

12. Reference Standards

Our editorial standards are informed by:

• Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics
• Google’s E-E-A-T quality guidelines
• Best practices from respected tech publications
• IEEE standards for technical journalism
• Reader feedback and community input
• Industry codes of conduct

Publications we respect:

• AnandTech (technical depth)
• Gamers Nexus (testing rigor)
• Tom’s Hardware (comprehensive coverage)
• TechPowerUp (database accuracy)

We aim to match or exceed their standards while maintaining our unique voice and approach.

---

Last updated: November 23, 2025

This page represents our commitment to honest, rigorous hardware testing and editorial integrity. We update these standards regularly to reflect our evolving practices and reader expectations.

Ohhmua.com – Honest Hardware Reviews, Rigorous Testing